To quote Mark Twain, “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.”
Perhaps you felt that way when the Democrat-led House finally found what they needed to press on to impeachment of Donald Trump. It was a “quid pro quo.” Did you know what that was? Or, did it send you to the Google search bar? Worry not, it did for many of us.
Actually it did for too many of us. That’s why suddenly in all of the interviews of Democratic House Intelligence members and all talking heads on MSNBC stopped using the phrase. They started using the word “bribery” instead. Why? It’s because the Democrats polled the public and quickly realized it was more understandable, hence an easier sell.
The Democrats always poll the public. It’s why they are so much better at controlling the narrative of the country than the Republicans. The old, stodgy, white, know-it-all Republicans tell you what they think. The Democrats tell you what you think.
Which brings us to COVID-19. There isn’t a leader of a state that is slower to open than some of the rest that doesn’t begin his or her press conference with “we are following the science and the data.” Clearly “science” and “data” are two words that resonate with America. They asked. They know. It sounds so logical why wouldn’t we follow?
Except there may be one little problem. The White House Coronavirus Task Force response administrator, Dr. Debora Birx had a direct comment or two for Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Apparently, in a two weeks ago task force meeting, Birx and others were frustrated with the CDC’s antiquated system for tracking virus data, which they worried was inflating some statistics — such as mortality rate and case count — by as much as 25 percent, according to four people present for the discussion or later briefed on it.
“There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust,” Birx reportedly said, according to two of the people present.
But that didn’t stop Dr. Birx in the last few days of separate interviews. In the first she said that an earlier lockdown would not have helped to prevent the spread of the virus. In a subsequent one she expressed concern that the weeks’ old lockdown was not having a positive effect in Washinton, DC., Chicago, or Los Angeles.
How about a little deductive reasoning? If an earlier lockdown would not have helped and the current one isn’t, then why did we lockdown? It must have been because of the science and the data? The longer you “serve” as a government employee, especially if you have a white coat with your name embroidered on it, the more this makes sense we assume. Having a scarf must help, too.
Finally, Birx worried aloud that “the fall could possibly bring the virus back as strong as ever.” Coincidentally, last week, the Director of the National Hurricane Center said “this season’s storms could possibly be more numerous than last year.” “Could possibly?” That’s going out on a limb.
Georgia looked at the science and the data. They said, “enough already.” So far, so good. Why? No one is sure, but the answer must lie in the science and the data.
Meanwhile Trump has had it with the great state of North Carolina’s slow reopening. In less than 100 days there is this little Republican National Convention of some interest scheduled in Charlotte. On Monday, Governor Roy Cooper responded to Trump’s tweet, saying, “State health officials are working with the RNC and will review its plan as they make decisions about how to hold the convention in Charlotte. North Carolina is relying on data and science to protect our state’s public health and safety.”
Cooper got it backward. He said “data and science.” It’s “science and data.” Maybe that’s why they are slower to open in NC than in Georgia.
The two states share a little border. There must be some strong antiviral “stuff” on the Georgia side of that ever so thin state line.
We should ask Birx and the CDC to see what the science and the data tell us about it.